Hans J.A. Schaap
Deputy Inspector General
Inspectorate for Environmental Protection
P.O. Box 450,
2260 MB Leidschendam, The Netherlands
SMALL BUSINESS COMPLIANCE, THE ROLE OF LOCAL COMMUNITIES
![]()
SUMMARY
In the Netherlands the municipalities are responsible for
issuing licenses and ensuring compliance with the regulations for the vast
majority of firms. The paper deals with
the experience of the last five years in stimulating the municipalities who in
general were well behind in the issue of licenses and in their inspection
activities. Enforcement by local
communities is given a special boost by three developments which are outlined,
the Public Nuisance Act Implementation Plans, the programmed inspection projects
concerning chemical waste and the additional funds, which force municipalities
to cooperate with one another. The
results of a more systematic inspection and the use of civil law, criminal law
and administrative law are described.
The importance of cooperation between authorities and the necessity to
interest the police and judiciary in the subject is emphasized. Attention is paid to environmental auditing
and growing awareness in industry. The
waste problem is mentioned as a subject of special concern. The comments have concentrated primarily on
what is being done to force small and medium sized firms to comply with the
environmental legislation.
1. LEGISLATION
Many laws concerning the protection of the
environment have been enacted in the Netherlands since the late 1960s, to add
to the Public Nuisance Act, which was originally passed in 1875. Initially, each new Act was designed to
tackle a separate problem area, such as water pollution, pesticides, air pollution,
waste and noise pollution. For several
years efforts have been made to integrate the separate Acts into the
environmental Protection (General Provisions) Act. Proposals specifically designed to replace the various licenses
required of firms by the separate Acts with a single license are now before
Parliament. For more detailed
information on the Dutch legislative system reference should be made to the
review article in the International Environmental Reporter of July 1989.1
2. LICENSING
BY MUNICIPALITIES
In the
Netherlands the provinces are responsible for issuing licenses to such large
industrial units as refineries, power stations and chemical-processing plants
which cause serious pollution or pose a major threat to the environment
and for ensuring that they comply with the regulations, while central
government is responsible, for example, for nuclear power stations and
processors for chemical waste, for which specialized expertise is needed.
The vast majority of firms, however, are the responsibility
of the 650 or so municipalities in the Netherlands, which vary in size from a
few thousand to half a million inhabitants.
Until a few years ago the Public Nuisance Act
required the issue of a separate license, with conditions attached, for
virtually-anything that had an effect on the environment (from a fire hydrant
booster in a residential building to a cattle farm, a joinery works, an
electroplating plant or a chemical laboratory). Since the Public Nuisance Act was amended, however, simpler
activities, like those of bakeries, garages, dry-cleaning establishments,
office buildings, LPG filling stations and propane gas depots, have been
governed by general regulations adopted at central level and directly
applicable to such activities.
Consequently, operators need notify only the municipal authority before
commencing an activity governed by these regulations. This amendment to the Act greatly improves the situation not only
for operators but also for municipalities since it means that the workload
created by the issue of licenses can be reduced somewhat. This reduction was badly needed, research
carried out in 1977 having revealed that in practice municipalities failed to
issue firms with appropriate licenses in over two-thirds of all cases, owing
partly to a lack of capacity (too few staff), partly to indifference and partly
to unwillingness (they wanted to be kind to industry as a source of
employment). If the situation was bad
where the issue of licenses was concerned, it can be imagined what the
monitoring of compliance was like. In
general, and certainly until the mid1980s, inspections by the municipalities
were almost entirely confined to occasions when serious complaints had been
received from the public. As a result,
all manner of insidious forms of pollution, such as soil contamination and
abuses involving chemical waste, went undetected.
3. THE
IMPORTANCE OF ENFORCEMENT
In the
mid-1980's far more emphasis began to be placed on the importance of
enforcement. Pieter Winsemius, then
Minister for the Environment, presented his view of the environment policy in the
form of the life cycle of environmental problems he had developed, indicating
how, in the first stage, a period of differing opinions on the nature and
seriousness of the problem slowly gives way to acceptance of the problem, after
which the development of policy is set in motion, culminating in the third
stage: the solution provided by
legislation. This is followed by the
fourth stage, the administrative phase, in which prime importance is attached
to inspection and enforcement (see Figure 1). He also indicated the place of
enforcement in the chain of regulation (see Figure 2), referring to the serious
danger of its always becoming the weakest link. In this context he stressed the importance of constant movement
in this chain: where regulation is found to be deficient, experience gained
from enforcement must stimulate the adjustment of legislation and the
rules governing the issue of licenses.
The whole system is, moreover, kept in constant motion by policy
planning, which is periodically adjusted.
A number of scandals, which drew attention to the
poor enforcement of environmental legislation, helped to prompt several
measures taken from the mid-1980s to raise the standard of enforcement and
strengthen the role played by the municipalities in this respect.
4. HELP
WITH THE PROGRAMMING OF MUNICIPAL ENFORCEMENT
As we have already said, many municipalities were
well behind in the issue of licenses and in their inspection activities. As a first step towards improving this
situation, the Public Nuisance Act Implementation Plans were devised in the
early 1980s. Municipalities were able
to obtain money from central government to draw up a plan to tackle
environmental problems in their area of jurisdiction. They could use the money to commission an external consultancy
firm or employ people to clarify two aspects in particular: 1. what firms in
the municipality were governed by the Public Nuisance Act and which of them
should be given priority in the issue of appropriate licenses and systematic
inspection, and 2. what organizational arrangements needed to be made to ensure
that municipalities achieved an acceptable level in the performance of the
tasks assigned to them by the Public Nuisance Act? The municipalities took considerable advantage of this scheme. About 90% of them established a Public
Nuisance Act Implementation Programme.
For a fair number of municipalities (especially the larger ones) the
programme acted as an incentive to pursue a sound policy on the application and
enforcement of the Public Nuisance Act.
But there were also a good many municipalities where the programme was
shelved, leaving noting but good intentions.
5. MUNICIPALITIES
AND TOXIC WASTE
A second
incentive for the municipalities to take a greater interest in the environmental
aspects of firms in their area was the stricter application of the Chemical
Waste Act. A national multi-year
programme for the stricter enforcement of the legislation on chemical waste (2)
was launched in 1984. The Chemical
Waste Act requires firms to surrender chemical waste to a limited number of
collectors and processors licensed by the central authorities. Not only did these licensees have major
shortcomings: it was also found that,
instead of keeping their chemical waste separate, many firms were storing it
with ordinary industrial waste, discharging it into the sewers and sometimes
even allowing it to drain away into the soil.
While the central authorities are responsible for monitoring collecting
and processing firms, a task they have been performing far more systematically
since 1984, the municipalities seemed the obvious choice for the task of monitoring
compliance with the Chemical Waste Act by the more than 150.000 firms in the
Netherlands that generate chemical waste in one form or another. As outlined above, however monitoring the
enforcement of the Act had not progressed very far at this level. Inspection projects financed by the central
authorities were set up to encourage the municipalities both to make checks on
f firms in general to ensure compliance with environmental legislation and to
supervise the enforcement of the Chemical Waste Act. In particular, municipalities were encouraged to cooperate in
their inspection activities and to adopt a sectoral approach by checking, say,
all the car respraying shops, all the electroplating firms or all the shipyards
in a given area. The advantage of this
approach is that municipal officials can be taught inspection techniques
together and attend joint courses on the enforcement of criminal law,
report-writing, social skills, etc. The
multi-year programme was therefore accompanied by an extensive training
programme and the development of instruction manuals for the inspectors and of
information material to be left with firms at the time of the first
inspection. The information material
was., moreover, geared specifically to each sector in which checks are
made. That this exercise was no luxury
is evident from the fact that the first round of inspections showed some 80% of
the firms in any sector to be unaware of their obligations under the Chemical
Waste Act.
6. THE
POLICE AND THE PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS DEPARTMENT
The multi-year programme was also used to encourage
the police and the Public Prosecutions Department to take a greater interest in
the enforcement of environmental legislation.
A conscious decision was taken in the Netherlands not to set up a
separate environmental police force, because we were convinced from the outset
that the police, being on patrol 24 hours a day and well versed in criminal law
and having considerable potential throughout the country, can play an extremely
important role in the enforcement of environmental legislation. They must, of course, be appropriately
trained and given suitable sampling equipment, for example, and have the
technical support of environmental specialists. The aim in this connection is close cooperation between the
police and the municipal or intermunicipal environmental service. This cooperation is steadily taking shape
and will be further intensified as a result of the recent reorganization of the
Netherlands police force, which entails the merging of the national and
municipal police forces and the formation of police regions (districts) with
expertise in special fields, including environmental crime. The Department of the Environment has given
the police a great deal of support in the form of training courses, sampling
equipment and subsidies for inspection projects.
The careful approach to the programme for stricter
enforcement of the legislation, the improvement in the quality of the official
reports drawn up by environmental officials and the police and the close
cooperation on a number of major environmental cases have led to a substantial
increase in interest and willingness to take out prosecutions in recent
years. This was one of the factors that
prompted the current reorganization of the Public Prosecutions Department and
the appointment of far more public prosecutors to deal almost exclusively with
environmental crime.
7. THE
NEED FOR BETTER FINANCING
The
effectiveness of the multi-year programme for the stricter enforcement of the
legislation on chemical waste was evaluated on several occasions while it was
being implemented. To this end,
workshops were, for example, held in various parts of the country for
municipal, provincial and police administrators and officials, public
prosecutors, representatives of water control and purification boards and civil
servants so that they might exchange experience, discuss working methods and
identify bottlenecks. The most
important problem to emerge from all these meetings, which were held at five
places in the country, was the lack of structural financing needed by the
municipalities for the satisfactory performance of their environmental tasks,
including enforcement. The temporary
contributions towards the cost of implementing inspection projects under the
programme for the stricter enforcement of the legislation did not attract the
new, permanent staff members who were badly needed. The municipalities in the Netherlands receive their funds from
central government in the form of a general annual remittance and effectively
have no significant tax revenues of their own.
A study carried out by a private agency of the financial options
available to the municipalities for the proper performance of their
environmental tasks showed that their total annual shortfall ran into tens of
millions of guilders. This prompted the
Cabinet to take the political decision to allocate to the municipalities
additional annual amounts, which will rise to some 50 million guilders (about
25 million dollars) in 1994. This
supplement is not simply added to the municipalities' annual remittance, but
earmarked for the development of a better municipal environmental policy in the
years to come. Furthermore, the
Department of the Environment has devised a financing arrangement with the
Union of Netherlands Municipalities.
This arrangement encourages intermunicipal cooperation and makes the
municipalities directly accountable to the municipal councils and the
Inspectorate for Environmental Protection.
To ensure that the municipalities achieve sufficiently high enforcement
standards and are able to attract well-trained and experienced people, the
smaller municipalities are now required to cooperate if they want to take
advantage of the financial arrangement.
This requirement applies to all municipalities with fewer than 70,000
inhabitants. Municipalities with a
larger population are free to use the money they obtain to improve their own
administrative machinery, but if they decide to cooperate with other
municipalities, the amount is increased by 25%. The arrangement was introduced this year and ..is already a
success. Many municipalities are opting
for cooperation. The municipalities
also have to contribute funds of their own, especially when they have spent
little on environmental policy in the past.
When applying for a subsidy, they must show that they will have achieved
the required licensing and enforcement standards by 1995. The money obtainable is far from always
sufficient to fund these efforts. A
second requirement to be satisfied by municipalities is the submission of an
annual report to the municipal council on the progress being made towards the proper
performance of the
environmental tasks. They must obtain
the opinion of the Regional
Inspector for Environmental Protection on the application for a subsidy and on the draft
annual report in each case. The Inspectorate
for Environmental Protection forms part of the Ministry of Housing, Physical
Planning and the Environment, whose involvement therefore signifies an
assessment by central government.
8. ENFORCEMENT
IN PRACTICE
Enforcement
is being given a special boost by the three developments outlined here, the
Public Nuisance Act Implementation Plans, the programmed inspection projects
concerning chemical waste and the additional funds, which force municipalities
to cooperate with one another. An
interesting aspect in this context is that each municipality retains
administrative responsibility for any corrective action taken against
firms. As, however, a more professional
civil service apparatus with better trained people is at the service of each
municipality's administrators, enforcement can be better and more efficiently
organized. The administrators
responsible for environmental matters in the various municipalities are
required to meet periodically to discuss the management of public services and
both to establish plans of action and set priorities and to monitor the various
activities. This also results in the
administrators concerned influencing each other in a positive sense. It can even be said that they teach each
other, for example, not to be too ready to let environmental interests take
second place to economic factors in their own municipal administrations, which
small municipalities in particular are rather inclined to do. Cases of firms simply being left to go on
operating without a license or even illegally are consequently becoming less
numerous. The process of significantly
raising the municipalities' licensing and inspection standards must be
completed in the first half of the 1990S.
9. SYSTEMATIC
INSPECTION
We are now
at the stage of building on the experience gained in the past five years in
programming and the setting of priorities.
During this period many municipalities have begun to monitor firms more
systematically (often for the first time).
As we have already said, the first round of inspections frequently shows
compliance with the legislation to be very poor. The emphasis is then on warnings and information on what the law
requires. A second inspection often
produces the opposite picture: over three-quarters of the firms complying with
the law in most respects. A third visit
results in sanctions being imposed on those who continue to flout the law. An official report is drawn up as the first
step in the initiation of criminal proceedings, or they are forced to comply by
the threat of, periodic penalties. It
often helps if a uniformed police officer accompanies the environmental
inspector on his third visit. Many
firms, particularly the smaller ones, then realize that things are getting
really serious, make the best of a bad job and change their ways. It is
confidently claimed that systematic inspection can persuade more than 90% of
all firms in most sectors to comply with the regulations. The success rate is highest in sectors where
firms are generally very careful and professional. Problems arise, for example, with scrap yards, used oil
collectors and processors and small electroplating firms. In general, it can be said that
economically marginal firms pose the most serious problems because they lack
the money to install the equipment needed to protect the environment. In such cases, municipal administrations
quite often take an ambivalent view, especially if the firms concerned have
been in their area for many years. The
problem is sometimes solved by reorganizing or removing such firms using money
earmarked for urban renewal. Where a
municipality has allowed a firm to operate without a license for years, it is
also very difficult suddenly to take a tough line because our supreme appeal
body in matters of administrative law, the Council of State, opposes such
action. It is also far from easy to
initiate criminal proceedings in such situations.
10. CIVIL LAW
In the Netherlands increasing use is also being made
of civil law to counter violations of environmental legislation. Successful prosecutions have been brought
against firms guilty of soil pollution in the past. Some 120 suits against such firms are currently before the
courts. The fact that the authorities
systematically prosecute any offender who does not proceed to clean up the soil
of his own volition has a twofold effect.
The number of cases of voluntary soil decontaminations has increased
enormously, and Dutch industry as a whole is now working on a plan whereby it will
itself systematically identify and clean up all polluted industrial areas. The threat of a special levy to form the
equivalent of the American "superfund" also helped in this
respect. Secondly, the knowledge that
infringements of environmental laws may prove very costly has a highly preventive
effect: firms are generally becoming more cautious about taking risks with the
environment.
It has also proved effective in practice to resort to
civil law where, for example, toxic waste has been imported illegally. Summary proceedings are initiated and
periodic penalties imposed to force foreign firms to take such waste back. This type of civil action is also used quite
frequently in combination with criminal proceedings, when the object is, for
example, to stop the illegal storage of dangerous substances or toxic waste
without delay. There is then no need to
await the end of lengthy criminal proceedings to put an end to abuses.
11. CRIMINAL LAW
Penalties in the Netherlands are not high as a
rule. Fines are comparatively
small. Custodial sentences, which are
not easily obtained, are of short duration.
The requirements concerning the onus of proof are, moreover, strict in
criminal law. Few cases involving
chemical waste have resulted in custodial sentences. Fines are imposed mainly for illegal discharges into surface
water, spreading manure on land during periods when this practice is
prohibited, causing noise nuisance, infringing' safety regulations, etc. The number of criminal cases is rising
steadily. The more active role played
by the public prosecutors is clearly discernible. Public prosecutors also close cases by coming to an arrangement
with the offender whereby the latter buys off the prosecution. At one time the sums paid were often
small. Now they run to hundreds of
thousands of guilders. When cases are
brought before a criminal court, there is a growing tendency for offenders to
be not only fined but also required to pay a sum equivalent to the economic
advantage they have derived from their illegal conduct, such as the costs saved
by not having chemical waste processed by a specialized firm.
12. ADMINISTRATIVE LAW
Administrative law provides for few penalties to
discourage illegal activities.
Administrative fines like those in the USA are unknown to the Dutch
administrative system. It is only in
the last few years that the Public Nuisance Act has provided for periodic
penalty payments: a municipality may require a firm to pay, say, a thousand
guilders for each day it is in breach of the regulations. This has proved to be an effective weapon,
particularly in the case of firms which fail, for example, to install a certain
piece of technical equipment to limit emissions. A Bill seeking to insert a clause to this effect in the other environmental
Acts is now before Parliament. The
harshest penalty that may be imposed under administrative law is the partial or
complete closure of a firm. In many
cases, however, this is too drastic a measure, especially where relatively
minor offences are concerned. The
procedure is, moreover, complicated by all manner of appeal options. In practice, closure is a penalty that is
not used widely, but with some regularity.
It is more common for the regulations with which a firm must comply to
be tightened up after complaints from people living nearby or as a result of an
inspection.
13. COOPERATION AMONG AUTHORITIES
In recent years the three levels of administration in
the Netherlands, national, provincial and municipal, have increasingly taken to
sharing responsibility for the implementation of the environmental policy and,
in particular, enforcement. The
abovementioned multi-year programme for the stricter enforcement of the
legislation on chemical waste helped in this respect in that central government
provided money for inspection programmes.
These programmes were drawn up jointly by the provinces and the
municipalities and led to inspections of firms in certain sectors of industry
where chemical waste occurs in relatively large quantities. The Inspectorate for Environmental
Protection was also involved in these projects and their preparation. It arranged training courses, compiled
inspection manuals, etc., and the Environmental standby Team also offered the
police its assistance in serious and complex forms of environmental crime. In addition, the National Information Centre
for Environmental offences attached to the Central Inspectorate acts as a vade
mecum for the local police, for example, when the environmental conduct of
certain individuals or firms is in question.
Now that more financial resources are available and
intermunicipal cooperation has begun, the intention is to transfer as much of
the responsibility for the application and enforcement of the environmental
legislation as possible to the intermunicipal associations, around 60 of which
have been established in the country.
The aldermen responsible for environmental protection, the public
prosecutor and representatives of the Inspectorate for Environmental
Protection, the water control and purification boards and the police will
participate in the administrative consultations at this level, which have been
discussed above. The consultations are
chiefly intended as an opportunity to coordinate the various enforcement
activities and to establish an annual programme. Similar consultations already take place in the 12 provinces, and
they will now be used principally to introduce some coherence into the
activities of the various intermunicipal associations (regions). The priorities set at national level in
discussions between representatives of the three levels of administration will
influence programming at provincial and intermunicipal level. The partnership model outlined here must be
taken as the basis for the further development of the enforcement of the
environmental legislation in the years to come.
14. ENVIRONMENTAL AUDITING
A modest start has been made in the Netherlands on
the introduction of environmental self-care systems within firms. Some very large firms have themselves
recognized the need for clarity and the coordination of the various measures
taken by individual firms to protect the environment. There is a growing conviction that corporate environmental policy
must be integrated into overall corporate policy. Most medium-sized and smaller firms, however, are still
unfamiliar with the phenomenon of environmental self-care. Pilot projects designed to overcome this
ignorance and enable firms to gain the necessary experience are now being
implemented. Clearly, many small firms
find it impossible to employ one or more people of their own to ensure
compliance with the environmental regulations.
To enable environmental self-care to be introduced at this level, it has
been suggested that environmental advisers should be appointed in certain
sectors to provide firms with information from their own employers'
organization and to help them to set up simple environmental self-care
systems. Another experiment involves
regional agencies run bij industry itself, to which firms can turn for an
inspection of the environmental aspects of their operations and for advice on
any improvements that need to be made.
The results of the first environmental self-care trials have been
evaluated, the conclusion being that the time is not yet ripe for legislation
to be introduced in this area or for environmental self-care systems to be made
compulsory, for example. The trial
period has therefore been extended.
15. SUPPORT MEASURES
It is generally appreciated that stricter enforcement
must be complemented by measures relating to training, equipment, information
and research. Periodic evaluation is
also important. The programme of
research on enforcement includes regular studies of the effectiveness of all
manner of legal instruments, the number of prosecutions and their outcome, the functioning
of the consultative bodies (e.g. those which discuss enforcement at provincial
level), the results of the inspection projects, etc. These studies are urgently needed if lessons are to be learnt
from shortcomings. Direct feedback from
practical experience is also very important, especially for policy-makers. It reveals, for instance, what can and what
cannot be enforced. An example to
illustrate this: until recently the masters of inland waterway vessels were
able to get rid of their used oil free of charge by handing it to suppliers of
new oil or by discharging into facilities in ports or at locks. Now they have a pollution levy to have it
properly processed. The effect has been
the opposite of that intended: more oil than ever is being discharged into the
water illegally. The legislation will
therefore have to be amended to cater for this. The polluter-pays principle is fine, but it does not always work. Small firms in particular sometimes make it
necessary to create facilities to ensure compliance with the law. The municipalities, for example, have set up
collection points for small quantities of chemical waste, where the public can
deposit leftover paint, batteries etc. and firms too may leave small quantities
of chemical waste. This system proved
rather successful.
Effective enforcement stands or falls with the
setting of the right priorities for inspections of firms. As it is impossible to keep a permanent
check on every firm, inspections must be made at reasonable intervals, related
to the level of environmental risks posed by the various types of firm. A consultancy firm has drawn up a plan for
the Inspectorate for Environmental Protection whereby firms are divided into
four categories and inspected at different intervals, ranging from an average
of once a year for firms posing the greatest risk to once every five to ten
years for firms posing a minor risk.
This inspection system is being introduced in the municipalities and is
seen as the standard for meeting the requirement that the goal be an
appropriate level of enforcement. It
should be noted that the intervals referred to are average periods. Some firms will, of course, be inspected by
the municipality more frequently than once a year, where, for example, their
record of compliance indicates the need.
16. OBJECTIVE FOR THE NEAR FUTURE
With the system of financing, enforcement instruments
and backup facilities described above the intention is eventually to reach the
stage in the latter half of the 1990s where enforcement activities and, above
all, penalties can be confined to the small minority of willful offenders
(estimated at about 10 to 15%, who are always to be found in any
situation. Well-organized enforcement
must be capable of dealing with these offenders, even though there will always
be individuals and small firms that go on trying to pollute the environment
without being detected. The vast
majority will, it is to be hoped, adhere strictly to the rules.
Detection will be important in the future
developments which have been outlined here and are considered desirable because
a quick reaction to deliberately illegal conduct makes it clear to potential
offenders from the outset that environmental offenses do not pay and to
habitual offenders that getting rich at the environment's expense is a thing of
the past. Prosecutions have a strong
preventive effect, as do regular inspections.
Inspection is also important because regular contact between the
authorities and persons under their jurisdiction has a highly educational
effect and, at the same time, provides the necessary information on the impact
of statutory provisions in practice.
The feedback mechanism is therefore important for the policy. It is thus clear that enforcement is not the
last link in the chain of regulation, just one of many: implementation and
policy development are joined by these links.
The policy will become rigid and the rules may be lose sight of reality
if lessons are not learnt from the results of inspections.
Enforcement is directed at factors which either
undertake activities in or outside a plant that act as a source of pollution or
market or use certain products that are likely to have adverse effects. In the sphere of enforcement the source
oriented environmental policy can always be applied to those who are
responsible for this source. The facts
still emerging on the adverse effects which numerous human activities have on
the environment continually make it necessary for new limits to be imposed. More legislation, unavoidable where an
environmental problem is growing, makes enforcement more difficult. Where it is certain that the government
cannot be accused of pulling back where environmental policy is concerned,
enforcement is bound to make heavy demands on all levels of administration.
17. ENFORCEMENT IN A PLURALISTIC SOCIETY
In a pluralistic society where there is a growing
trend toward individualization it is more difficult to get across the message
that every citizen and every firm has a duty to abide strictly by the provisions
of environmental legislation. A great
deal of effort is therefore needed to make it generally understood that, given
the wide variety of activities, the rules that have been laid down are
unavoidable. This also means that the
message cannot go out from just one or two authorities. The prevention of pollution must be
generally accepted as the concern of every member of society. This calls, above all else, for the highest
possible number of enforcement agents.
In recent years all kinds of steps have been successfully taken to
interest the police and judiciary in this subject. This work must be continued and stepped up. Only when every policeman, every public
prosecutor and every judge is sufficiently familiar with the environmental
legislation can both day-to-day inspection and the administration of criminal
justice be expected to have a strong preventive effect. It is also extremely important to motivate
supervisors from such special services as water boards, the customs authority
and the Factory Inspectorate. The
national, provincial and municipal authorities must also perform their
inspection tasks in such a way that they have a highly educational effect. Building on the experience gained from pilot
projects forming part of the multi-year programme for the stricter enforcement
of the legislation on chemical waste, administrators in particular must be
persuaded of the need to give priority to the enforcement of the rules laid
down in the environmental legislation.
They must let it be known that these rules will be enforced as a matter
of course by not hesitating when administrative action is required. In this they must have the support of proper
reports on appropriate inspection carried out by the officials in their
charge. Knowledge of what is wrong has
a motivating effect provided that it is backed up by sound facts and
findings. Given the seriousness of the
environmental problem, a great deal of care will have to be taken in the future
to stimulate administrative action at all levels throughout the Netherlands,
because tackling problems of a global nature will increasingly require more
careful action at local and regional level.
18. GROWING AWARENESS IN INDUSTRY
Firms and sectors of industry are becoming
increasingly aware of the need for some kind of environmental monitoring of the
activities of enterprises. This trend
must be encouraged to grow in the future.
Inspection will primarily consist in drawing firms' attention to their
own responsibility. The conviction in
some sectors of industry that the distortion of competition caused by
contravention of environmental legislation is unacceptable will grow if it is
ensured that the inspecting authorities provide satisfactory information on
what the law requires and effective action is taken against offenders. The main aim is to have industry at large
accept that circumventing environmental legislation is inconsistent with a
professional approach and the code of conduct that well managed firms are
expected to obey. If it is to be achieved,
this conviction must prevail throughout the firm, from board level to middle
management and the shop floor. This
will be possible only -if environmental studies are integrated into vocational
and company training courses and internal environmental protection becomes an
integral part of management.
Education at a wide variety of strategic places in
society must teach how to make the whole population of a pluralistic society
with an increasing range of human activities understand that prevention of pollution
is a matter of life and death.
19. THE WASTE PROBLEM
The professionalization of industry in this respect
means not only monitoring direct emissions into water, soil and air and taking
great care over the products manufactured but also giving as much thought as
possible to the waste that is produced.
Waste has too long been regarded as an irrelevant quantity in
management. The damage and shame
caused, for example, by costly soil decontamination operations and abuses
involving chemical waste have made it increasingly clear how much attention
this subject requires. This attention
must be focused not only on what happens to waste on a firm's premises but also
on what is done with it after it has been removed. It has been found that all too often waste then ends up in the
hands of traders or firms whose overriding objective is not to handle it
professionally but to make - sometimes big - profits by not treating or using
it as they have led its originator or the authorities to believe.
Refraining from discharging waste into water, soil
and air invariably exacerbates the problem.
This imposes an additional heavy burden of responsibility on industry
and the authorities to ensure that such waste is treated with extreme
care. Reducing the quantities by modifying
processes, recycling, etc. must, of course, be one of the first steps, but
careful monitoring of unavoidable waste until it reaches its final destination
is just as essential. A great deal
still needs to be done in this respect, as recent experience with enforcement
operations throughout the Netherlands and in other countries has shown. Waste processors and transporters must be
constantly and more strictly monitored and consistently prosecuted, under both
criminal and administrative law, when they commit offences so as to rid the
waste disposal industry of firms which do not belong in a professional sector
which is aware that it plays a key part in the protection of the environment.
Nor is this a task for the Netherlands alone. International cooperation is badly needed
here. This subject will be considered
at length when item 3 is discussed.
20. CONCLUDING REMARK
To conclude, it can be said that we are only halfway
to our goal of raising the enforcement of the environmental legislation to an
appropriate level. The above comments
have concentrated primarily on what is being done to force small and
medium-sized firms to comply with the legislation, and I have also tried to
make it clear that the municipalities have an important role to play in our
system and how we are in the process of equipping them for this task. In addition, the provinces and central
government must take efforts to persuade the large firms to adhere strictly to
the regulations. That too is no small
task, and different strategies again are being developed for it.
REFERENCES
1 The
Bureau of National Affairs Inc., International Environmental Reporter, July
1989
2 For
further information see: The Dutch programme for enforcing environmental
legislation by Hans J.A. Schaap, Ministry of Housing, Physical Planning and the
Environment, the Netherlands (1988).